Academic Senate
Youngstown State University
Youngstown, Ohio  44555

ACADEMIC SENATE MINUTES (Corrected)

January 19, 2000

Note:  Agenda items for the February 2 Senate meeting should have been submitted to Bege Bowers, English Department, by 5:00 p.m. Friday, January 21.  For the future, provide both hard copy and a disk copy in Word 6/95 or rich text format if you want material to appear in the online agendas and minutes.  Agendas and minutes will be posted at the Academic Senate web site: <http://www.ysu.edu/acad-senate/>.  A downloadable cover sheet is available at the web site.
 
 


Click on the links in the table to go directly to a specific section of the minutes.

Actions Previous Minutes OFC Report Overview New Business
Academic Events Committee Academic Planning Committee Academic Programs Committee Academic Research Committee Academic Standards Committee
Charter & Bylaws Committee Elections & Balloting Committee General Education Committee Honors Committee Integrated Technologies Committee
Library Committee Senate Executive Committee Student Academic Affairs Committee Student Academic Grievance Comm. University Curriculum Committee
 Correction  Appendices University Outreach Committee Unfinished Business Return to Senate Homepage 



Overview of meeting:

Topics presented/discussed: proposed changes to the Senate Charter and Bylaws; proposed changes to academic standards on semesters; general education.

Top of Page

Actions:

Top of Page

Call to Order:

Jim Morrison, chair of the Academic Senate, called the meeting to order at 4:05 p.m.

Top of Page

Minutes of the Previous Meeting:

Minutes of the 1 December 1999 Senate meeting were approved as distributed.

Top of Page

Senate Executive Committee / Report from the Chair: Jim Morrison reported:
 

Top of Page



Ohio Faculty Council Report: Jim Morrison reported on the OFC meeting that took place this past Friday in Columbus.  Discussion continued on benefits for domestic partners (a collective-bargaining issue at YSU).  The OFC met with Matt Filipic, vice chancellor, and had a lengthy discussion on possibilities for “performance measures.”  The governor has requested a statewide “report card” for universities as well as the schools—even though some measures, such as students’ graduating in four years, are not always realistic for a number of the state institutions.  Presidents have been meeting on this issue.  A meeting is scheduled for March, at which representatives will be appointed by the presidents to talk about performance issues.
Top of Page

Charter and Bylaws Committee: Committee chair Dale Harrison referred to several of the items the committee had attached to the agenda (minutes of the committee’s November 23 meeting and two items from Brandon Schneider, student representative at-large to the Senate). The committee will meet with Schneider, continue to consider the matters, and report at a future Senate meeting.

The rest of the report focused on proposed changes to the Senate Charter and Bylaws.

Harrison referred to the summary of proposed semester-related changes attached to the agenda.  He made an editorial change to delete the specific dates of the new contract (item 2 in the summary).  Charles Singler asked for an additional editorial change: in the proposed revision for Bylaw 4, 1 (c), replace “December 1” with “at the conclusion of the December Senate meeting or, in the absence thereof, on December 1.”

Harrison moved that the Senate accept for mail balloting the proposed Charter revision (attached to the agenda) to reflect conversion from quarters to semesters.  The motion was seconded, a vote was taken, and the motion carried.

Changes to the Charter require a 2/3 affirmative vote of the faculty by mail ballot. Article II, section 3, of the Charter defines “faculty” as “those employed as full service personnel who hold academic rank and are paid, at least in half-part, by one or more academic departments.”

Harrison then moved that the Senate accept, with the change Charles Singler mentioned earlier, the proposed revisions to the Bylaws to reflect the conversion from quarters to semesters (the proposed changes were attached to the agenda). The motion was seconded, a vote was taken, and the motion carried.

Changes to the Bylaws require an affirmative majority vote in the Senate; Bylaws changes become effective if there are no challenges during the challenge period.

Top of Page

Elections and Balloting Committee:  No report.
 

Top of Page


Academic Standards Committees:  Frank Castronovo, reporting for the committee, noted that the Academic Standards Committee, in response to a request from the Senate Executive Committee, has considered matters related to academic standards for which language in the catalog needs to be changed for semesters.

Main Motion

Castronovo moved that the Senate accept, in one vote, six of the “motions” listed on the Academic Standards Committee’s handout (see Appendix A):  numbers 1-5, plus number 7 (i.e., all except number 6).  The motion was seconded, and discussion followed.

Motion to Amend the Main Motion

Brandon Schneider moved that we amend number 4 to say “21 hours or more per semester” instead of “18 hours or more per semester.”  The motion to amend was seconded, and discussion followed.

George McCloud:  The committee discussed this matter extensively and felt 21 hours would be a high number to take on semesters without some vetting.  If there is a justification for taking more than 18 hours, the student can seek approval.

Charles Singler:  Twenty-six hours—the number of hours permitted on quarters—was excessive.  However, the 18-hour stipulation on semesters would have a significant impact on the better students, such as honors students, who regularly take 18 or more hours per term.  I think 21 is a reasonable number of hours for semesters.

Schneider:  I proposed 21 hours because that will make seven courses the cutoff—since most semester courses will be 3-hour courses.  Also, one must average 16 hours a semester to graduate in four years.

Nancy White:  Someone seems to have applied the 2/3 rule in a place where it’s not applicable.  Students should be encouraged to take the same number of hours on semesters that they take on quarters.  However, not all courses will be 3-hour courses.

Patricia Sarro:  Perhaps the wording is causing this confusion.  Should number 4 say “more than 18 hours”?

Morrison:  The motion is to change 18 to 21.  If you want to say “more than 18 hours,” you need to vote to defeat the amendment and then suggest another amendment.

A vote was taken, and Schneider’s motion to amend the main motion to say “21 hours or more per semester” carried.

Discussion of and Vote on the Main Motion

Gordon Mapley:  Does anyone have a copy of the items referred to in number 2?

Castronovo:  I’ll have to investigate.  I’m substituting for Louise Pavia, who couldn’t be here.

Bill Jenkins, parliamentarian:  You can just withdraw number 2.

Castronovo:  I withdraw number 2.

Jan Elias requested a division of the motion so that we could look at each recommendation individually.

Jenkins: The “demand of a single member compels division.” The matter is not debatable.

There was no discussion on number 1. A vote to accept number 1 was taken; number 1 was accepted.

There was no discussion on number 3. A vote to accept number 3 was taken; number 3 was accepted.

There was no discussion on number 4. A vote to accept number 4, as amended by Schneider’s motion to amend, was taken; the amended number 4 was accepted.
 
This paragraph is a correction to the minutes; it was inadvertently omitted in the original minutes:  There was no discussion on number 5.  A vote to accept number 5 was taken; number 5 was accepted.

Discussion on number 7 followed:

Nancy White asked about the current hour requirements for taking courses CR/NC.  Several people noted that the current Undergraduate Bulletin, p. 32, says students must have “at least 16 quarter hours” with a GPA of 2.0 to take courses CR/NC; the maximum number of hours that may be taken CR/NC is currently 20 for a baccalaureate degree and 10 for an associate degree.

Duane Rost:  What is the rationale for the increase on semesters?

Castronovo:  We considered the number allowed at other institutions.

A vote to accept number 7 was taken; number 7 was accepted.

Top of Page

Academic Programs Committee:  Committee chair Kathylynn Feld announced that all but four program areas have been approved for semesters.  A large circulation packet will arrive in deans’ offices Monday or Tuesday, January 24 or 25.  She commended her committee, which has been meeting frequently.

Top of Page

University Curriculum Committee: Kathylynn Feld reported for Patricia Hoyson, chair of the Curriculum Committee, who was teaching.  A list of approved courses from Circulation Packet 2 appears in Appendix B.  The committee will meet again on January 24 to review courses for Accounting and Finance and revisions for the English Department.  The committee is awaiting some other revisions and memos related to objections to courses.

Top of Page

Academic Planning Committee: No report.

Top of Page

General Education Committee: Bill Jenkins, committee chair, noted that courses certified for general education are listed on the general education web site at <http://www.ysu.edu/ger/GERlist. html>.  You can download a complete list there.  Also on the site is a listing of courses, marked in bold type, that are still circulating or that have been objected to.  The committee is winding down in regard to regular general education course proposals.

Jenkins gave the following reminder:  Incoming freshmen are the only ones required to follow the new general education requirements; students presently here will generally take courses according to the current system.  A current student could choose to follow the requirements in the new catalog, but Jenkins doesn’t encourage doing so.

Jenkins noted that the committee hasn’t received many proposals for intensive and capstone courses. The model requires writing-intensive courses to be on the upper-division level.  Departments should follow through.  Try to get intensive or capstone courses to the General Education Committee by the end of winter quarter.

J.-C. Smith:  Must one submit a syllabus for certification of capstone courses?

Jenkins:  Yes.  We check to see if the syllabus reflects the elements required in a capstone course (goals 1, 2, and 3).

Top of Page

Integrated Technologies, University Outreach,Library Committee, Academic Research, Student Academic Affairs, Student Academic Grievance, Honors, and Academic Events Committees: No reports.

Top of Page

Unfinished business: None.

Top of Page

New business: None.

Top of Page

Adjournment: The meeting adjourned at 4:50 p.m.



Appendix A:  Academic Standards Committee Report and Proposed Changes
Top of Page


Appendix B:  University Curriculum Committee Report (Scanned Image)

Top of Page


Appendix C:  Sign-in Sheet (Scanned Image)

Top of Page


Return to Top of Page

Return to Senate Homepage

For further information, e-mail Bege Bowers.