|
Completed Strategic
Plan
The May 10, 2002,
draft of the plan was endorsed by the Board of Trustees
at its June 2002 meetings. The completed plan is
therefore the same as the May 10 version, except
that the word "draft" has been removed
and the date has been changed to June 28, 2002:
Download Completed Plan *
May 10, 2002,
Draft Incorporating Additional Suggestions for
Revision
Download Draft *
March 27, 2002, Draft
Incorporating Board of Trustees Suggestions for
Revision
The attached draft incorporates
revisions suggested by the Board of Trustees at
the March 14, 2002, Board meeting, as well as a
few additional revisions:
March 27, 2002, Draft Goals and Strategies
*
March 14, 2002,
Board of Trustees Suggestions for Revision
The Board of Trustees
met on March 14, 2002, and made suggestions for
revising the draft goals and strategies. The Board's
suggestions are noted in red in the attached file:
March
14, 2002, Goals and Strategies *
To see the previous (March 5, 2002)
drafts, see the next section on this page.
Revised Goals and Strategies, March 5, 2002
In late February and
early March 2002, members of the Steering Committee
revised the draft goals and strategies created by
the strategic planning subcommittees. The revised
drafts eliminate some of the repetition from section
to section and separate goals and strategies from
the more specific objectives.
The revised versions
appear in two formats at the links below:
(1) the "short"
format, which includes draft priorities,
goals, and strategies without supporting objectives
(this is the format that will go to the Board of
Trustees for discussion in March), and
(2)
a "long"
format, which includes a partial set
of objectives in addition to the draft priorities,
goals, and strategies. These objectives (i.e., the
items preceded by three numbers separated by periods,
such as 1.1.1) are representative examples only,
not a comprehensive list. Additional objectives
will be added as we develop an action plan.
You may send comments
about the revised drafts to bkbowers@cc.ysu.edu.
(If you responded to previous drafts, your comments
are on file and you don't need to send the same
comments again.)
February
2002 Revisions of Goals and Strategies
Between January 24 and
February 18, 2002, subcommittees revised the drafts
of goals and strategies brainstormed at earlier
meetings. If you sent comments about earlier drafts,
they were given to the subcommittees. You can see
the original draft and subcommittee revisions at
the links below:
Early
Draft of Goals and Strategies *
Subcommittee
Revisions of Early Draft *
December
2001 Revision of Critical Issues
In December 2001, the
Board of Trustees revised and reprioritized the
Critical Issues and Priority Statements. You can
see the revised version at the link below:
Critical
Issue *
December 16, 2001,
Revision of Core Values
In response to a Board
of Trustees request, the Strategic Planning Steering
Committee revised and shortened the list of Core
Values. You can see the revised version at the link
below:
Core
Values *
December
6, 2001, Board of Trustees Discussion
At a retreat on December
6, 2001, the YSU Board of Trustees revised and prioritized
the Strategic Planning Critical Issues and Priorities
Statements. You can view the revisions at the link
below:
Critical
Issues/Priority Statements *
November 14, 2001,
Board of Trustees Discussion
At a retreat on November
14, 2001, the YSU Board of Trustees revised the
Strategic Planning Defining Principles and YSU Core
Values. The Core Values were again revised in December
2001, but you can view the November 14 versions
at the links below:
Defining
Principles
Core
Values
November
7, 2001, Report to Academic Senate
Report to the Academic Senate
7 November 2001
Bege Bowers, Chair, Strategic Planning Committee
In his September 12 address to the
Academic Senate, Provost Tony Atwater reported that
the University would soon begin a strategic planning
process. He noted,
The timetable will be tight. We
will work significantly over this semester and
a small portion of spring semester. We want a
draft of the strategic plan to go to the Board
of Trustees in time for the Board’s March
2002 meeting. This timeframe drives us to identify
our priorities, assess them, and move forward.
The working title of the plan is "Designing
Our Future in the 21st Century: The Centennial
Strategic Plan of Youngstown State University."
The process is focused on helping the University
advance into and beyond 2008, the centennial anniversary
of the University.
Since the September Senate meeting,
the planning process has begun in earnest. The Strategic
Planning Steering Committee has met almost every
week, and the Strategic Planning Committee has met
twice. The 37-member Strategic Planning Committee
includes faculty, staff, students, bargaining-unit
representatives, administrators, Board of Trustees
members, and community members.
The Steering Committee and Planning
Committee have drafted "Defining Principles"
and "Core Values" to guide the planning
process, asked a variety of groups to identify critical
issues they feel the University should address,
appointed a publicity subcommittee to keep the campus
and community informed about the planning process,
assembled a research team to gather data, and begun
to identify priorities and goals. We are asking
the Senate, at the November 7 meeting, to provide
additional information that will be helpful to the
committees as we continue the planning process.
We are also attaching to the agenda
a variety of appendices to keep you informed about
the planning process:
[Note: Some of the documents referred
to in this Senate report were later revised. Links
to the revised versions appear above.]
Appendix SPC I: List
of Strategic Planning Committee Members
Although we do not plan to discuss
the the Defining Principles, Core Values, and Critical
Issues at the November 7 Senate meeting, we invite
you to e-mail comments about any of these items
to Bege Bowers at bkbowers@cc.ysu.edu
and especially to identify any critical issues that
you feel are missing from the list.
The Strategic Planning Committee appreciates
your comments and will continue to solicit input
and feedback from campus and community constituencies
throughout the planning process.
|